Relationships Social Environment and Self-Efficacy of Learning Results of Bugis Bridal Processes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32533/05102.2021Keywords:
social environment, self-efficacy, bugis bridal, local wisdom, bridal make-up.Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between social environment and self-efficacy on learning outcomes of Bugis bridal make-up. Using a quantitative approach with a correlation test. Purposive sampling technique is carried out by taking the subject not based on strata, random or regional but based on the existence of a specific goal, namely by involving 34 students who are following the subject of Bugis bridal make-up. Based on the results of the Pearson correlation test, it was shown that the relationship between social environment variables and learning outcomes of Bugis bridal make-up was obtained as â´-Value <Sig. 0.05 means it can be concluded that there is a relationship. The results of the correlation test for variable X2, namely Ï-value 0.247> 0.05, means that there is no significant relationship, while for the correlation test between social-environmental variables on self-efficacy it is obtained Ï-Value 402> Sig. 0.05, it can be concluded that the social environment variable has no significant relationship to the self-efficacy variable. that the social environment variables and self-efficacy together on learning outcomes of Bugis bridal make-up have no significant relationship because of Ï-Value 0.675> Sig. 0.05. This means that the social environment and self-efficacy cannot shape students to improve learning outcomes of Bugis bridal make-up.References
Bandura, A. 1997. Self-Efficacy The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
Barnett, E., and M. Casper. 2001. “A Definition of"social Environment" [1].†American Journal of Public Health 91 (3): 465. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.91.3.465a.
Boubonari, Theodora, Angelos Markos, and Theodoros Kevrekidis. 2013. “Greek Pre-Service Teachers’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Environmental Behavior toward Marine Pollution.†Journal of Environmental Education 44 (4): 232–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2013.785381.
Byers, Terry, Wes Imms, and Elizabeth Hartnell-Young. 2018. “Comparative Analysis of the Impact of Traditional versus Innovative Learning Environment on Student Attitudes and Learning Outcomes.†Studies in Educational Evaluation 58 (October 2017): 167–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.07.003.
Canha, Marco Nuno De, Aimee Steyn, Analike Blom van Staden, Bianca Daphne Fibrich, Isa Anina Lambrechts, Lilitha Lwando Denga, and Namrita Lall. 2020. “Book Review: Herbal Principles in Cosmetics: Properties and Mechanisms of Action.†Frontiers in Pharmacology 10 (January): 2019–21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.01513.
Chu, Regina Juchun, and Anita Zichun Chu. 2010. “Multi-Level Analysis of Peer Support, Internet Self-Efficacy and e-Learning Outcomes - The Contextual Effects of Collectivism and Group Potency.†Computers and Education 55 (1): 145–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.011.
Dantcheva, A, and Jl Dugelay. 2011. “Female Facial Aesthetics Based on Soft Biometrics and Photo-Quality.†IEEE Conference on Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering 5: 1–6. http://www.antitza.com/DanDug_ICME.pdf.
Gagne, Robert M, Leslie J Briggs, and Walter W Wager. 2005. Principles of Instruction, Fourth Edition. United States of America: Ted Buchhlz. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4140440211.
GarcÃa-Ãlvarez, MarÃa Teresa, Isabel Novo-Corti, and Laura Varela-Candamio. 2018. “The Effects of Social Networks on the Assessment of Virtual Learning Environments: A Study for Social Sciences Degrees.†Telematics and Informatics 35 (4): 1005–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.09.013.
Gasse, Roos Van, Kristin Vanlommel, Jan Vanhoof, and Peter Van Petegem. 2020. “Teacher Interactions in Taking Action upon Pupil Learning Outcome Data: A Matter of Attitude and Self-Efficacy?†Teaching and Teacher Education 89: 102989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102989.
Goldman, Daphne, Bela Yavetz, and Sara Pe’er. 2006. “Environmental Literacy in Teacher Training in Israel: Environmental Behavior of New Students.†Journal of Environmental Education 38 (1): 3–22. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.38.1.3-22.
Haworth, Ryan. 2016. “Personal Learning Environments: A Solution for Self-Directed Learners.†TechTrends 60 (4): 359–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0074-z.
Karo-Karo, Isran Rasyid S, and Rohani. 2018. “Benefits of Media in Instructional.†Axiom 7 (1): 91–96.
Leeuwenkamp, Karin J. Gerritsen-van, Desirée Joosten-ten Brinkea, and Liesbeth Kester. 2019. “Students’ Perceptions of Assessment Quality Related to Their Learning Approaches and Learning Outcomes.†Studies in Educational Evaluation 63 (July): 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.07.005.
Liu, Shiang Yao, Shin Cheng Yeh, Shi Wu Liang, Wei Ta Fang, and Huei Min Tsai. 2015. “A National Investigation of Teachers Environmental Literacy as a Reference for Promoting Environmental Education in Taiwan.†Journal of Environmental Education 46 (2): 114–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2014.999742.
Mirzawati, Nanda, Neviyarni Neviyarni, and Rusdinal Rusdinal. 2020. “The Relationship between Self-Efficacy and Learning Environment with Students’ Self-Directed Learning.†Jurnal Aplikasi IPTEK Indonesia 4 (1): 37–42. https://doi.org/10.24036/4.14343.
Pe’er, Sara, Daphne Goldman, and Bela Yavetz. 2007. “Environmental Literacy in Teacher Training: Attitudes, Knowledge, and Environmental Behavior off Beginning Students.†Journal of Environmental Education 39 (1): 45–59. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.39.1.45-59.
Raghavendra, Parimala, Claire Hutchinson, Emma Grace, Denise Wood, and Lareen Newman. 2018. “‘I like Talking to People on the Computer’: Outcomes of a Home-Based Intervention to Develop Social Media Skills in Youth with Disabilities Living in Rural Communities.†Research in Developmental Disabilities 76 (December 2017): 110–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2018.02.012.
Salanova, Marisa, Laura Lorente, and Isabel M. MartÃnez. 2012. “The Dark and Bright Sides of Self-Efficacy in Predicting Learning, Innovative and Risky Performances.†The Spanish Journal of Psychology 15 (3): 1123–32. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_sjop.2012.v15.n3.39402.
Saribas, D. 2015. “Investigating the Relationship between Pre-Service Teachers’ Scientific Literacy, Environmental Literacy and Life-Long Learning Tendency.†Science Education International 26 (1): 80–100.
Saribas, Deniz, Gaye Teksoz, and Hamide Ertepinar. 2014. “The Relationship between Environmental Literacy and Self-Efficacy Beliefs toward Environmental Education.†Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 116: 3664–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.820.
Schulz, Richard, and Jutta Heckhausen. 1996. “A Life Span Model of Successful Aging.†American Psychologist 51 (7): 702–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.7.702.
Sum, K. W.R., T. Wallhead, S. C.A. Ha, and H. P.C. Sit. 2018. “Effects of Physical Education Continuing Professional Development on Teachers’ Physical Literacy and Self-Efficacy and Students’ Learning Outcomes.†International Journal of Educational Research 88 (January): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.01.001.
Sumiani. 2016. “Symbol and Meaning of Bugis Bridal Makeup.†Jurnal Seni Budaya “Pakarena†Vol. 1 (1): 1–17.
Sunarijah, I Nyoman Sudana Degeng, I Wayan Ardana, and Sulton. 2016. “The Effect of Learning Strategy and Achievement Motivation towards Learning Natural Science Outcome and Scientific Attitude at Eight Grade of Junior High School.†IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME) 6 (2): 110–14. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-060201110114.
Tuncer, Gaye, Ceren Tekkaya, Semra Sungur, Jale Cakiroglu, Hamide Ertepinar, and Michael Kaplowitz. 2009. “Assessing Pre-Service Teachers’ Environmental Literacy in Turkey as a Mean to Develop Teacher Education Programs.†International Journal of Educational Development 29 (4): 426–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2008.10.003.
Tuncer Teksoz, G., J. W. Boone, O. Yilmaz Tuzun, and C. Oztekin. 2014. “An Evaluation of the Environmental Literacy of Preservice Teachers in Turkey through Rasch Analysis.†Environmental Education Research 20 (2): 202–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.768604.
Verstege, Sjors, Héctor J. Pijeira-DÃaz, Omid Noroozi, Harm Biemans, and Julia Diederen. 2019. “Relations between Students’ Perceived Levels of Self-Regulation and Their Corresponding Learning Behavior and Outcomes in a Virtual Experiment Environment.†Computers in Human Behavior 100 (December 2018): 325–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.020.
Yavetz, Bela, Daphne Goldman, and Sara Pe’er. 2009. “Environmental Literacy of Pre-Service Teachers in Israel: A Comparison between Students at the Onset and End of Their Studies.†Environmental Education Research 15 (4): 393–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620902928422.
Zhang, Lining, Hubert P. H Shum, Li Liu, Guodong Guo, and Ling Shao. 2019. “Multiview Discriminative Marginal Metric Learning for Makeup Face Verification.†Neurocomputing 333: 339–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2018.12.003.
Zimmerman, Barry J., and Dale H. Schunk. 2015. “Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance.†Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203839010.ch3.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
