Pengembangan Kurikulum Berbasis Guru di Indonesia, Mungkinkah?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32533/07106.2023Keywords:
teacher-based curriculum, structuring dilemma, teacher as implementer, teacher as active subject of curriculum developerAbstract
Secara teoretis, peran guru dalam pengembangan kurikulum pada dasarnya mendapat tempat penting dalam literatur karena terkait dengan kualitas implementasi dalam peran mereka sebagai agents of change di dunia pendidikan. Namun demikian, peran tersebut berpeluang tereduksi ketika terjadi sentralisasi penyusunan dan pengembangan kurikulum, seperti ketika diterbitkan rangkaian kebijakan kurikulum nasional. Setelah menelusuri konsep-konsep yang menunjukkan betapa pentingnya peran guru sebagai pengembang kurikulum, penulis menganalisis aturan birokratis perundang-undangan, yakni UU No. 20/2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional dan UU No. 14/2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen. Hal ini dilakukan terutama untuk melihat bagaimana guru diposisikan dalam sistem tersebut dan bagaimana semua itu memungkinkan peluang bagi reorientasi sistem pengembangan kurikulum berbasis guru. Hasil analisis menunjukkan dilema struktural atau bahkan strukturasi, di mana unsur politis dan birokrasi sangat desisif dalam pengembangan kurikulum. Di tingkat sekolah, meskipun terdapat konsep pengembangan kurikulum tingkat satuan Pendidikan (KTSP), strukturasi yang kuat menjadi hambatan utama bagi insiatif dan inovasi kurikuler di tingkat guru.References
Alexander, R. (2012). Neither National Nor a Curriculum?. Forum, Volume 54, Number 3, 2012.
Apple, M. W. (1993). The Politics of Official Knowledge: Does a National Curriculum Make Sense. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 14:1, 1-16, DOI: 10.1080/0159630930140101
Armer, M. (1977). Education and social change: An examination of the modernity thesis. Studies In Comparative International Development, 12(3), 86–99. doi:10.1007/bf02686512
Azhar, K. (2017). Human Agency in a Curriculum: an Analysis of an Indonesia’s 2013 Curriculum for Primary Level. (Master’s Thesis). Tampere: Tampere University
Ballantine, J. H. & Hammack, F. M. (2012). The sociology of education: A systematic analysis (7th ed.). NJ: Prentice Hall.
Barker, C. (2005). Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice. London: Sage.
Beauchamp, G. A. (1975). Curriculum Theory. Illinois: The Kagg Press
Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, Vol. 21, No. 6, 624–640. DOI: 10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325
Cheng, Y. C. (1994). Effectiveness of Curriculum Change in School: An Organizational Perspective. International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 8 No. 3, 1994, pp. 26-34
Giroux, H. A. (1988). Teachers As Intellectuals: Toward A Critical Pedagogy of Learning. Westport: Bergin and Garvey
He, M. F, Schultz, B.D, & Schubert, W. H. (Eds). (2015). The SAGE Guide to Curriculum in Education. California: Sage
Hughes, M. (1997). The National Curriculum in England and Wales: A Lesson from Externally Imposed Reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 33 (2), 183-197
Jenkins, G. (2019). Teacher agency: the effects of active and passive responses to curriculum change. The Australian Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00334-2
Lunn, S. & Solomon, J. (2000). Primary Teachers' thinking about the English National Curriculum for science: autobiographies, warrants, and autonomy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37(10):1043 – 1056
Ornstein, A. C., Hunkins, F.P. (2018). Curriculum: Foundations, Principles, and Issues. England: Pearson
Priestley M., Edwards, R. & Priestley, A. (2012). Teacher Agency in Curriculum Making: Agents of Change and Spaces for Manoeuvre. Curriculum Inquiry 42:2 (2012). DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00588.x
Quicke, J. & Winter, C. (1996). Autonomy, relevance and the National Curriculum: a contextualized account of teachers’ reactions to an intervention. Research Papers in Education, 11:2, 151-172, DOI: 10.1080/0267152960110203
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
