Pengembangan Kurikulum Berbasis Guru di Indonesia, Mungkinkah?

Khairil Azhar,1* Laksmi Dewi2

   1 Mahasiswa Program Doktor Pengembangan Kurikulum Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)
   2 Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)
   * Corresponding Author

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32533/07106.2023

Abstract


Secara teoretis, peran guru dalam pengembangan kurikulum pada dasarnya mendapat tempat penting dalam literatur karena terkait dengan kualitas implementasi dalam peran mereka sebagai agents of change di dunia pendidikan. Namun demikian, peran tersebut berpeluang tereduksi ketika terjadi sentralisasi penyusunan dan pengembangan kurikulum, seperti ketika diterbitkan rangkaian kebijakan kurikulum nasional. Setelah menelusuri konsep-konsep yang menunjukkan betapa pentingnya peran guru sebagai pengembang kurikulum, penulis menganalisis aturan birokratis perundang-undangan, yakni UU No. 20/2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional dan UU No. 14/2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen. Hal ini dilakukan terutama untuk  melihat bagaimana guru diposisikan dalam sistem tersebut dan bagaimana semua itu memungkinkan peluang bagi reorientasi sistem pengembangan kurikulum berbasis guru. Hasil analisis menunjukkan dilema struktural atau bahkan strukturasi, di mana unsur politis dan birokrasi sangat desisif dalam pengembangan kurikulum. Di tingkat sekolah, meskipun terdapat konsep pengembangan kurikulum tingkat satuan Pendidikan (KTSP), strukturasi yang kuat menjadi hambatan utama bagi insiatif dan inovasi kurikuler di tingkat guru.


Keywords


teacher-based curriculum, structuring dilemma, teacher as implementer, teacher as active subject of curriculum developer

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alexander, R. (2012). Neither National Nor a Curriculum?. Forum, Volume 54, Number 3, 2012.

Apple, M. W. (1993). The Politics of Official Knowledge: Does a National Curriculum Make Sense. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 14:1, 1-16, DOI: 10.1080/0159630930140101

Armer, M. (1977). Education and social change: An examination of the modernity thesis. Studies In Comparative International Development, 12(3), 86–99. doi:10.1007/bf02686512

Azhar, K. (2017). Human Agency in a Curriculum: an Analysis of an Indonesia’s 2013 Curriculum for Primary Level. (Master’s Thesis). Tampere: Tampere University

Ballantine, J. H. & Hammack, F. M. (2012). The sociology of education: A systematic analysis (7th ed.). NJ: Prentice Hall.

Barker, C. (2005). Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice. London: Sage.

Beauchamp, G. A. (1975). Curriculum Theory. Illinois: The Kagg Press

Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, Vol. 21, No. 6, 624–640. DOI: 10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325

Cheng, Y. C. (1994). Effectiveness of Curriculum Change in School: An Organizational Perspective. International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 8 No. 3, 1994, pp. 26-34

Giroux, H. A. (1988). Teachers As Intellectuals: Toward A Critical Pedagogy of Learning. Westport: Bergin and Garvey

He, M. F, Schultz, B.D, & Schubert, W. H. (Eds). (2015). The SAGE Guide to Curriculum in Education. California: Sage

Hughes, M. (1997). The National Curriculum in England and Wales: A Lesson from Externally Imposed Reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 33 (2), 183-197

Jenkins, G. (2019). Teacher agency: the effects of active and passive responses to curriculum change. The Australian Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00334-2

Lunn, S. & Solomon, J. (2000). Primary Teachers' thinking about the English National Curriculum for science: autobiographies, warrants, and autonomy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37(10):1043 – 1056

Ornstein, A. C., Hunkins, F.P. (2018). Curriculum: Foundations, Principles, and Issues. England: Pearson

Priestley M., Edwards, R. & Priestley, A. (2012). Teacher Agency in Curriculum Making: Agents of Change and Spaces for Manoeuvre. Curriculum Inquiry 42:2 (2012). DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00588.x

Quicke, J. & Winter, C. (1996). Autonomy, relevance and the National Curriculum: a contextualized account of teachers’ reactions to an intervention. Research Papers in Education, 11:2, 151-172, DOI: 10.1080/0267152960110203


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2023 Khairil Azhar, Laksmi Dewi